TITLE
What skills and attributes does an
accounting graduate need? Evidence from student perceptions and employer
expectations
FORMULATION OF THE PROBLEM
1.
have been developed as part of their degree programmes?
2.
What professional skills do employers
expect accounting graduates to possess at entry level?
3.
What professional skills do graduating accounting students perceive as
having the highest priority for career success?
4.
To what extent do graduating accounting students perceive that these
professional skills
5.
What is the difference between student perceptions and employer
expectations in terms of the professional skills that are important for a
career in accounting?
PURPOSES
OF THE RESEARCH
The present study examines
perceptions of graduating students about the skills and attributes they
consider important to their career, and the emphasis placed on the development
of these skills during their degree programme. The present study also examines
the skills and attributes expected by a diverse group of employers and explores
gaps between student perceptions and employer expectations.
RESEARCH
METHOD
1.
Sample
We conducted a study involving data
collection from 322 graduating students in three universities in Australia 1
and 28 practitioners across a number of organizations and industries who employ
accounting graduates.
In Institution 1, 172 students were
undertaking either a Bachelor of Commerce or a dual degree with Bachelor of
Commerce. Of the 160 students who nomin- ated their major, 56 per cent were
studying an accounting major, with finance (37 per cent) and international
business (7 per cent) being the most popular second major. In Institution 2,
all students were studying an accounting major as part of a Bachelor of
Commerce or Master in Accounting with finance the most popular second major.
The students in Institution 3 numbered 120 and were studying either a Bachelor
of Business or a dual degree with business and 68 per cent were studying an
accounting major. In terms of preferred employment after graduation,
accounting, finance, audit, law and taxation were the preferred areas.
2. Data
collection
Both
quantitati ve and qualitative
(Minichiello et al. , 1995) data collection methods were used.
2.1. Quantitative measures
The quantitative study involved the same survey being
administered to the student cohorts during lectures. The Albrecht and Sack
(2000) survey instrument was adopted because it had been validated previously
in a large US study. Minor refinements were made for the Australian context and
to include areas highlighted by students in pilot focus groups. The survey
consisted of three sections:
Section 1
asked students to rate on a scale ranging from 1 (strongly agree) to 5
(strongly disagree) statements about the importance of studying various
programmes in accounting and business. Section 2 required students to rate 47
specific skills/attributes on a scale ranging from 1 (no priority) to 5 (top
priority) in relation to: (i) importance to their future careers, and (ii) the
level of priority they perceived had been given to developing these skills
during their degree programme.
1 The universities were public and
private institutions and differed in terms of size, approach and focus. They
were selected to allow a more representative cross section of student
participants to avoid bias and support generalizable findings.
2.2. Qualitative measures
A qualitative study to assess the expectations of employers
and to focus on processes occurring in practice as explained by those directly
involved (Miles and Hubermann, 1994) was conducted. During focus groups and
individual meetings, a semistructured interview approach was adopted allowing
all particip- ants to respond to the same set of questions (Carruthers, 1990).
Interviews and focus groups were taped and transcribed to generate facts
opinions, and insights (Yin, 1984). Two independent raters (M and N) assessed
the transcripts and identified and ranked on a scale of 1 (no discussion) to 5
(much discussion) the attributes and skills that employers considered
important. The rankings were then summed to produce a score for every attribute
resulting in two sets of combined ‘importance’ scores (Tashakkori and Teddlie,
1998). Discussions between the raters and the investigators resolved any
differences that became apparent. The reviews were designed to acknowledge that
although ‘generalizations across individuals are of value, it is important that
the individual’s unique experience is not lost’ (Ashworth and Lucas, 2000, p.
304).
CONCLUSION
Students are a key stakeholder
group when it comes to examining views about developing skills and attributes
to equip them for a career in the accounting profession. The findings of the
present study reveal that students rated continuous learning as the most
important skill to future careers and, in terms of the Jones and Sin (2003)
model, were focused on developing routine technical expertise, oral and written
communication skills, analytical and problem-solving skills and appreciative
skills including decision-making and critical thinking. Indicative of their
stage of life, students focused on ongoing development of personal skills such
as professional attitude, self-motivation, leadership and the ability to work
in a team. However, what is of concern is the emphasis currently being placed
during accounting programmes on skills that students regard as important. It
would appear that the only skills being delivered in accordance with the
expectations of students in this study are routine accounting and research
skills. Because student motivation to learn and acquire skills is often driven
by perceptions about the relevance of these skills to their careers, the
findings of the paper have important implications for accounting educators.
With regard to employers, they are expecting graduates
entering the profession to have as the top three skills analytical/problem
solving skills, a level of business
Refernsi
:
M.
H. Kavanagh, L. Drennan/Accounting and Finance 48 (2008) 279-300
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar